For some time, the
Feed Validator has been muttering
warnings about
my Atom 1.0 feed, having to do with my
aggressive use of xml:base and relative URIs.
I fixed that up, and managed to convince Sam Ruby that one of the warnings
(due to a redirect from tbray.org to www.tbray.org)
was bogus. So
the
validator’s happy.
I also took a little extra trouble to prettify the feed, and now I think it’s
probably useful as an example of a fairly full-featured and
ultra-squeaky-clean Atom 1.0 feed; somewhat human-readable, even.
Have a look at
my feed and
Sam’s side-by-side,
his is very readable too, there are some points where the difference between
Sam’s choices and mine are instructive.
Anyone have a suggestion on how my feed might be improved, to serve even
better as an example?
